KLD Research & Analytics, Inc.
Your Connection to Social Investment Solutions
@KLD Newsline
October 29, 2002

In this issue

KLD INDEXES
Setting the Standard
for Social Investment

KLD Social Indexes
Closing values for 09/30/2002
 
Value
Change
%
302.75
-35.44
-11.71%
60.00
-7.10
-11.84%
61.26
-7.03
-11.48%

Domini Social Index
(DSI 400) is the first equity benchmark for social investors.

KLD Large Cap
SocialSM Index
(LCSI) is the large cap equity benchmark for social investors.


KLD Broad Market
SocialSM Index
(BMSI) is the comprehensive US equity benchmark for social investors.


KLD-NASDAQ
SocialSM Index
The Benchmark for Socially Screened Nasdaq Securities.

 

sign up Sign up for future
KLD notifications
Name
Company
E-Mail
Click here to unsubscribe from the KLD Newsletter.

 

Visit our website at
www.KLD.com

Featuring:

Contact Us

SIRI Group

SRI World Group, Inc. - Institutional Investors

September 2002: SEC discovers SRI

         Editor's Note: Due to a compositional error, a draft of our leader on the SEC was substituted in the @KLD Newsline dated October 24, 2002 for the article which appears below. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

          In September, the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) took two steps along a trail long blazed by SRI.

          First, the SEC proposed regulations that would require mutual funds and investment advisors to adopt proxy voting guidelines and report their votes to their investors. Then, on September 19, SEC Chair, Harvey Pitt told the Council of Institutional Investors (CII) he favored abolition of the “ordinary business” rule which the commission has used to block numerous shareholder resolutions of the last 25 years.

          Socially responsible investors can take much of the credit for forcing these issues.

         Proxy Voting Regs

          The proxy voting regulations, if adopted by the SEC, should end the long-standing practice of mutual funds and investment advisers voting blindly with management or neglecting to vote at all.

          “These rules,” says Adam Kanzer of Domini Social Investments, “should produce more accountable corporations on issues ranging from executive compensation to the environment.” SEC Chair Harvey Pitt told the CII, “I'm pleased we're finally addressing the petitions, which are premised on bedrock principles of the federal securities laws: transparency and adherence to fiduciary duties that require advisers to vote in their clients' best interests.”

          Social Mutual Funds: the Model. Shareholder activists began attacking the practice in the 1970s with Project GM and the movement for South Africa divestiture.

          During his stint at the Department of Labor during the mid-‘80s, Robert Monks staged the first regulatory attack on this practice. He ruled that the same fiduciary obligations applied to the voting of proxies as it did to investments. His logic was simple: The shareholder’s right to vote had an economic value; therefore, the manager has a fiduciary duty to vote in shareholder elections in the interest of the shares’ beneficial owners.

          There matters stood until 1996. In January of that year, Amy Domini asked KLD to formalize and prepare for publication, the proxy voting guidelines it had developed for the Domini Social Equity Fund in 1991. With their publication in March, Domini became, we believe, the first mutual fund of any sort to publish guidelines

          As for reporting proxy votes: “In 1999, Domini Social Investments and the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) became, respectively, the first mutual-fund company and first public retirement system in America to publish their proxy votes.” http://domini.com/about-domini/News/Press-Release-Archive/Barrons_OpEd_5-02.doc_cvt.htm

          Other socially screened mutual fund families and a few institutions have followed suit. See http://www.shareholderaction.org/proxy.cfm for a complete list. These include Pax World, Walden, Citizens, MMA Praxis and the General Board of Pensions of the Methodist Church. But these institutions are notable exceptions to the larger rule, which is not to disclose voting policies or records.

          The Rule-Making Petitions. How did the proposed rules come about? Adam Kanzer, General Counsel for Domini Social Investments, summarizes: “The proposed regulations are a direct response to rule making petitions filed by the AFL-CIO, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Domini Social Investments.”

          “The unions deserve significant credit for pushing this issue to the forefront of the SEC’s agenda, but it is difficult to imagine that the Commission would have taken this important step had Domini and other SRI funds not taken the lead by demonstrating that it is possible to provide this information in a timely and cost-effective manner.”

          The proposed regulations, of course, serve the cause of transparency. Managers will have to reveal what their policies are and how they implement them. Far more importantly, the regulations will compel managers to look closely at each proxy. If the regulations are ultimately adopted, corporate management can expect bruising fights over resolutions, and they will lose some of them.

          The mutual fund proposal will be found at: http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/33-8131.htm The investment adviser proposal: http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/ia-2059.htm The proposed regulations are outlined in the following article.

         “Ordinary business” exception to be abolished?

         Ensuring this sea change would be the abolition of the “ordinary business” exception which SEC Chair Harvey Pitt has proposed.

          For 30 years or more, the Commission has barred many social proxy resolutions on the grounds that they interfered with the corporation’s routine business operations. So, for instance, a resolution on ending sweatshops abuses at overseas vendor factories might would not reach shareholders if it directly raised the issue of wages. This out is unique to the SEC. Companies whose stock is not publicly traded do not enjoy this excuse.

          Pitt’s Proposal. What Mr. Pitt told the CII about the “ordinary business” rule is better quoted than summarized.

          “Recently issues have arisen regarding shareholder suffrage regarding options treatment. My approach to these issues is, above all else, pragmatic. The purpose of shareholder proposals is to give shareholders a chance to inform management about how they feel regarding major issues confronting corporations. Last year, when Disney was presented with a proposal to let shareholders express their views regarding whether their company's outside auditors should be allowed to do any consulting work, I strongly endorsed the right of shareholders to express their views on such a topical issue, breaking with past tradition. I believe the same is true with respect to options accounting. Whatever one's views are on the merits of the subject, it is clearly an issue of extraordinary importance; as a result, I don't think corporations should be able to exclude aggressive shareholder proposals like these under the rubric of the ‘ordinary business exception.’"

          “Indeed, I've asked our Director of Corporation Finance, Alan Beller, to consider a proposal to eliminate the ‘ordinary business exception’ from the list of reasons that companies can exclude otherwise validly promulgated shareholder proposals. It is my hope that we can eliminate this exception, making shareholder suffrage a reality, and sparing our Staff from trying to resolve what is, or isn't, within the purview of ordinary business issues facing public companies.”

          Social investors have waited a long time to hear this from an SEC Chair. Now, we must help him realize his – and our – goal.

         Caveat

         The proposed regulations and the proposal from Chairman Pitt will lack the force of law until they appear as adopted in the Federal Register. Both have powerful opponents. Those favoring their adoption have much organizing and lobbying to do (the public comment period on both rules ends December 6). Nonetheless, the terms of the debate have changed from whether the proposed actions should occur to when.

          This September brought social investors two victories to savour. With some more hard work, they may have two triumphs to celebrate early next year.

         Acknowledgments

          Adam Kanzer of Domini Social Investments and Kyle Johnson of KLD contributed extensively to this story. Our thanks to both of them.


KLD Analysts Mark Milestone

         On Sept. 28, 2002, KLD marked a research milestone: the 10,000th entry to the SOCRATES Continuous Update Log.

         The Continuous Update Log is the Research Department’s record of changes to the social profiles of the more than 3,000 companies KLD tracks. KLD has maintained the Log since Sept. 2001, as part of its daily company monitoring process.

         KLD’s bi-weekly publication, @kld, alerts SOCRATES clients to entries in the Continuous Update Log, ensuring that clients have up-to-date social information on their portfolio holdings.

         KLD Senior Research Analyst Libby Horan Edgerly, a KLD analyst since 1993, made the 10,000th entry when she logged a KLD concern assigned to the social profile of Wyeth.

         For more information about KLD’s research process, please contact Eric Fernald, KLD’s Director of Research at efernald@kld.com.


KLD Company Spotlight: Trex Company Inc.

          On January 18, 2002, KLD added Trex Company Inc. (TWP) to its Domini 400 SocialSM Index (DS 400). Trex manufactures lumber from recycled wood fiber and reclaimed polyethylene. The company’s composite lumber is used in residential decking, marina docks, boardwalks, playgrounds, and nature trails. Trex is notable for its innovative approach to recycled material and for the beneficial impact its product has on the recycling market.

         Trex’s principal product is decking manufactured from waste wood fibers and reclaimed plastics. The company obtains wood waste from woodworking operations and reclaimed plastic from recovered stretch films and plastic grocery bags. The company sources plastic grocery bags from major grocery chains that have bag-recycling programs. It buys stretch film from distribution centers in various industries that use the film in packaging and shipping. Trex reports that its decking is completely recyclable and that it accepts used Trex decking for recycling.

         Conventional wood decking is commonly pressure-treated with pesticides and other chemicals such as chromated copper arsenate (CCA), one of the most frequently used pressure-treating chemicals, to resist insect and weather damage. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recently reached an agreement with CCA producers to phase it out because arsenic may leach out of CCA-treated lumber, both during its use and after the lumber has been disposed of. EPA reached its conclusion after high arsenic levels were found under structures made from CCA-treated wood and in landfills used for building wastes. Trex’s decking does not require the use of pesticides and therefore eliminates pressure-treating problems.

         In June 2001, Trex launched a joint venture in Spain. The new company will collect and recycle approximately 20,000 tons of polyethylene film annually. Trex will have the right to purchase the venture's entire output.

         Four executives of Mobil created Trex, after acquiring Mobil's composite products division. Each of the company's five senior line executives is a former Mobil Oil Corporation employee. Trex went public in April 1999.

         For more information about Trex, please contact KLD Research Analyst Sam Warren at swarren@kld.com.


SHORT TAKES

Commission Proposes Disclosure of Proxy Voting by Mutual Funds, Investment Advisers
         
The Securities and Exchange Commission voted on September 19, 2002 to propose regulations requiring mutual funds and registered investment advisors to disclose their proxy voting policies and procedures and their actual proxy votes. If finally adopted, the regulation will enable fund shareholders to monitor their funds' votes on social and corporate governance issues – something they can’t do now.

         The Commission also proposed requiring investment advisers to adopt written policies and procedures governing the voting authority of client securities. Advisers would have to tell clients about these policies and how to obtain information from the adviser about votes cast.

         Investment Company Proposals

         The proposals affecting registered management investment companies would require the following:

         * Investment Company Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.
A fund would have to disclose in its registration statement the policies and procedures that it uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities. The procedures would include a process to resolve a conflict on a vote between the interests of fund shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the fund's investment adviser, principal underwriter, or any affiliated person of the fund, and on the other its investment adviser, or principal underwriter.

         * Investment Company Proxy Voting Record.
A fund would have to file its complete proxy voting record with the Commission. That information would include for each vote: information identifying the matter voted on; whether the matter was proposed by the issuer or by a security holder; whether and how the fund cast its vote; and whether the fund cast its vote for or against management.

         * Disclosure of Proxy Votes That Are Inconsistent With Fund's Policies and Procedures.
A fund would have to disclose in its reports to shareholders proxy votes inconsistent with the fund's voting policies and procedures and to explain the inconsistent votes.

         * Availability of Proxy Voting Information to Fund Shareholders.
A fund would have to make available to its shareholders information about its proxy voting policies and procedures and its voting record. The proposed regulations would require a fund to send the information within three business days of a request.

         Investment Adviser Proposals

         The investment adviser regulation would require:

         * Investment Adviser Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.
Investment advisers would have to adopt written policies and procedures governing their exercise of voting authority with respect to client securities. They would be designed to ensure that the adviser votes proxies in the best interest of clients and address material conflicts of interest that might arise between the adviser and its clients.

         * Investment Adviser Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.
Investment advisers would have to describe their proxy voting policies and procedures to clients and furnish a copy of this upon request.

         * Obtaining Information From Investment Advisers About Proxy Votes.
Investment advisers would have to inform clients how to obtain information from the adviser on how it voted proxies.

         The full text of the SEC’s releases concerning the proposed regulations is on the SEC Web site at: http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2002-139.htm..

         The mutual fund regulations themselves are at:
http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/33-8131.htm. The investment adviser regulations are at: http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/ia-2059.htm


SRI Alert: November 5 - Making it Right Conference:
         
On November 5th, 2002 in New York City, the first major conference to address the new sourcing challenges in the apparel, footwear and toy manufacturing and retailing industries: Hear leading CEOs, industry experts and monitoring groups talk about workplace compliance programs and the three major monitoring programs: The Fair Labor Association, SA 8000 and WRAP.

          Speakers include: Paul Charron, CEO , Liz Claiborne; Peter D. Whitford, President Worldwide, Disney Store; John Eyler, Chairman and CEO, Toys 'R' Us; William K. Fung, Group Managing Director, Li & Fung Limited; Hal Upbin, CEO, Kellwood; Auret Van Heerden, Executive Director, The Fair Labor Association; Alice Tepper Martin, President, Social Accountability International; Lawrence Doherty, Executive Director, Worldwide Responsible Apparel Production.

          Presented by World Monitors Inc., Lebhar-Friedman Chain Store Age and DSN Retailing Today, in collaboration with the Asia Society. Sponsored by Li & Fung.

          For a conference brochure and to register go to www.worldmonitors.com or e-mail: e-monitors@worldmonitors.com.


SRI Alert: Nov. 7 & 8 - Fourth Triple Bottom Line Investing Conference
         
The forth Annual Triple Bottom Line Investing Conference will take place at Hotel Le Plaza, Brussels, Belgium. The conference will feature workshops, panel discussions, and several keynote talks by representatives from the financial and business sectors.

         The agenda includes four analyst meetings in which TBL (Triple Bottom Line) analysts will meet with representatives from retail, chemical, life science, transportation, energy, and insurance to measure their performance against a Triple Bottom Line.

         With over 24 workshops and 105 speakers, TBLI is truly the leading SRI learning and networking event of the year.

         Planned workshops address Governance, TBL Regulation, Human Rights, Reputational Risk, Micro-Credit, Venture Philanthropy, Religion & TBLI, Social Auditing, Environmental Auditing, Latest TBLI Research, Corruption, Global TBLI funds, Stakeholder Engagement, Climate Change, and more. For regular updates on the program visit http://www.tbli.org.

         


Commentary: Heat Wave!
         
A book that might be more enticing now that the dog days of an exceptionally hot summer have passed is Eric Klinenberg’s Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago (Chicago, 2002). Klinenberg links the 700 deaths in the record-setting 1995 heat wave to the breakdown of civil society in neighborhoods around the city.

          Malcolm Gladwell wrote a positive review and insightful essay on Heat Wave . (“Political Heat”, New Yorker, August 12, 2002, pp. 76, 78-79.) In the midst of it, Gladwell digressed on the subject of air conditioner efficiency standards, a subject Klinenberg does not discuss.
It seems that President Clinton on his way out of office approved regulations that would require air conditioner manufacturers to increase efficiency from level 10 to level 13 on a scale called the seasonal energy-efficiency ratio (SEER). This spring, in response to lobbying by Carrier, the administration reduced the increase by a third.

          Now, this decrease won’t mean much to the polity which will pay less for air conditioners and more for electricity (and the consequent pollution, of course). Except in a heat wave.

          As we in Boston learnt three times this summer, air conditioners in heat waves place huge demands on the grid. Reducing the efficiency standards, says Gladwell, “means that by 2020 demand will be fourteen thousand megawatts higher than it would have been, and that we’ll have to build about fifty more power plants. The cost of those extra power plants - and of running a less efficient air-conditioner on hot days - is part of what will make air-conditioning less affordable for people who will someday desperately need it.”

          Last spring, the altered regulation seemed an insignificant loss in the war on the environment. Now, the super-heated, polluted air of Summer 2002 and the melting Arctic ice caps make the loss seem not insignificant at all.

          As Amory Lovins says, we don’t need megawatts; we need negawatts. – Peter D. Kinder


@kld November Schedule:
         
In the upcoming weeks, look for:

         October 28 & November 12: @kld- KLD's biweekly updates on changes in the social records of more than 3,000 companies.

         @kld delivers SOCRATES subscribers summaries of breaking stories, legal settlements, new environmental and social initiatives and corporate actions that impact companies on the S&P 500TM Index, Domini 400 SocialSM Index, Russell 3000TM Index and KLD Broad Market SocialSM Index (available only to KLD SOCRATES subscribers.)

         November 20: @kld Monthly Index Performance. This monthly publication provides data on the performance of KLD indexes.

         November 27: next issue of @kld Newsline, KLD's monthly newsletter featuring new developments in the socially responsible investing industry.


 

KLD Research & Analytics Inc. supplies social investment research, benchmarks, and compliance and consulting services to leading investment institutions worldwide. KLD is the creator of SOCRATES, a comprehensive online social research database, and of the Domini 400 Social IndexSM (DSI 400), KLD Broad Market Social IndexSM (KLD BMSI), and KLD Large Cap Social IndexSM (KLD LCSI). Visit our website at www.kld.com.

Privacy Statement | Legal Disclaimer