What should
the first steps be?
May trustees
of charities engage in mission-based investing?
Are different
legal standards applied to different types of
institutions?
What types of
institutions have adopted social investment policies?
Table 1: Examples
of Institutional Social Investment Policies
Like it or not, the days
when portfolio decisions could be made
in a complete moral and social vacuum
are numbered.
-- Financial Times editorial
(1990)*
Mission-based investing
can be a difficult concept for board members
and staff alike. It may require a change
in views on how an institution's purpose
might be accomplished, and it introduces
new criteria to the investment decision-making
process.
Proponents of a mission-based
investment policy will improve their position
by preparing for the board's deliberations.
Social investing has an undeserved reputation
for a lack of discipline, for the substitution
of "emotion" for "facts." Therefore, a
careful presentation of the financial
and policy arguments is essential.
Proponents of a mission-based
investment policy should take the time
to prepare their fellow board members,
key staff, and financial services providers.
A few principles should guide this education
effort.
- Keep discussions informal and in
settings that do not inspire conflict.
- Be open about short- and long-term
objectives.
- Emphasize the process for adopting
and implementing the policy.
- Focus on the benefits of mission-based
investing to the institution's purpose.
- Be candid about the arguments surrounding
mission-based investing.
This approach gives proponents
a chance to hear objections and respond
before positions become fixed, while creating
an atmosphere of trust around the concept
of a mission-based policy.
What
should the first steps be?
If the institution lacks
a mission statement, the first step should
be to develop a simple one. A mission
statement is a brief (less than a
page), sometimes inspirational, summary
of why an institution exists and what
its objectives are.
Step 1: Preparation. Be ready to answer the basic questions.
Step 2: Legality Check. Not every institution may use all of mission-based
investing's techniques to further its
mission. The sections that follow offer
some general guidance in this area; counsel
will have to provide answers specific
to the institution.*
Step 3: Preliminary Discussions.
Before launching a campaign, one should
know how the land lies. Discussions with
members of the board and staff will guide
tactical decisions.
Internal board politics
will define "success." In an initial effort
for a mission-based investment policy,
a major triumph may be convincing the
board to designate an ad hoc committee
to study the question.
May
trustees of charities engage in mission-based
investing?
This question ultimately
is one for counsel.* The answer
will depend on a number of factors, including:
- The nature of the entity seeking
to adopt a mission-based policy, i.e.,
is it a charitable trust or a charity
treated as a corporation?
- The type of policy to be implemented, e.g., proxy voting? portfolio
screening?
- The relationship between the institution's
mission and the policy.
- The source of the funds to be invested, e.g., endowment or capital
appreciation?
- The types of investments to be made, e.g., conventional securities
or below-market community investments?
Are
different legal standards applied to different
types of institutions?
Yes. Where trusts or charities
are concerned, the law usually allows
mission-based investing. The answer may
be different for some types of pension
funds.
In general, if a trust
instrument (a document creating a
trust) or a governing document (e.g.,
articles of incorporation) covers whether
the trustees may adopt non-financial guidelines,
then it determines the question. If a
trust instrument is silent on the subject,
trustees may take into account non-financial
considerations when either:
- the trust's charitable purpose
justifies spending trust funds on
the issue, or
- the investment decision advances
-- financially or operationally --
one of the trust's charitable activities.
This mission-based interpretation
of a board's power to adopt non-financial
criteria is a narrow one. For trusts generally,
the legal treatises* appear
to support a broad interpretation of the
trustees' powers to adopt non-financial
screens. Nonetheless, keeping the focus
on mission makes sense: it not only justifies
a policy to regulators and stakeholders
but also increases the chances of adoption
by the board. Counsel should advise on
whether a particular policy will advance
the trust's mission.
Entities subject to the
Uniform Management of Institutional Funds
Act (UMIFA) or its equivalent -- a class
that includes the vast majority of charities
-- seem to have at least as broad authority
for adopting mission-based guidelines
as charitable trusts. The standard applied
is the business judgment rule. The business
judgment rule shields a board or management
from liability on a transaction if:
- it was within the organization's
powers and management's authority,
and
- the board or management acted with
due care and in good faith.
In any event, the more closely
the risk-reward profile of the screened
investments resembles that of conventional
investments, the less subject to challenge
they may be.
Restatement (Third) of Trusts'
227 cmt. c (1990)
Top of Page
What
types of institutions have adopted social
investment policies?
Institutions of many types
have adopted social investment policies*.
The scale and scope of these policies
varies widely. Table 1 contains a representative
list of the types of social investment
policies adopted by institutions and examples
of those institutions.
Table
1. Examples of Institutional Social Investment
Policies
Type of Social Investment
Policy |
Type of Institution |
Examples |
Extensive screening and proxy
sponsorship
|
Foundation
|
Jesse Smith Noyes Foundation
|
Extensive screening & proxy
sponsorship
|
Defined benefit plan
|
United Methodist Pension Board
|
Extensive screening and proxy
sponsorship via mutual
fund/pooled account
|
Defined contribution pension
plan (401k)
|
American Medical Association
|
Extensive screening & proxy
sponsorship via mutual
fund/pooled account
|
Defined contribution pension
plan (457)
|
City of Milwaukee
|
Extensive screening
|
Annuity
|
Security Benefit Life
|
Limited screening & limited
activism
|
Endowment
|
Harvard University
|
Legislatively mandated single
screen
|
Public D.B. Pension Fund
|
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
|
Restricted by law/regulation
|
Taft-Hartley D.B. Plan
|
Teamsters Pension Funds
|
Top of Page